In the realm of economic development, the cultivation of a new form of productive capability stands as a crucial requirement and focal point for the promotion of high-quality growthThis emergent paradigm, often characterized by innovation and efficiency, necessitates a robust reform in how capital markets operate, particularly in the context of catering to technology-driven enterprises.

Historical analysis suggests that certain structural enhancements in the listing and funding mechanisms of capital markets could significantly bolster this new productive forceFor instance, there have been numerous instances where promising firms, hindered by existing rules, found themselves precluded from listing on the A-share marketMeanwhile, enterprises such as Nvidia and Tesla in the U.S. capital market, despite enduring periods of financial losses, thrived through successive rounds of financing, eventually emerging as leading giants in their sectorsThis marked contrast highlights the need for China to adapt its capital markets to facilitate the growth of its tech firms, particularly those at various developmental stages.

One argument for reform posits that the traditional barriers around IPOs need to be dismantled to give high-growth potential firms the latitude to raise funds without being shackled by immediate profitability concernsData from 2018 to 2024 reveals a stark disparity: approximately 50% of companies listed in the U.S. without profits, while only a modest 9.5% of A-share listings fit this category since the establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation BoardThis disparity indicates a pressing need for more adaptive financial structures.

Furthermore, the encouragement of stock-based incentives and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) emerges as a crucial strategy in scaling up innovationCountries with mature financial ecosystems view stock incentives and M&A as pivotal to technological progressIn 2023, China witnessed only 2.6% of A-share companies undergoing control changes, whereas the U.S. consistently recorded figures above 5%. This signals a gap that could be addressed by enhancing our institutional frameworks to allow for more dynamic exchanges.

Equally important is the suggestion to expand the utility of bond financing

Advertisements

By establishing consistent standards for technology innovation entities to issue bonds, introducing instruments like innovation bonds and corporate debt options could boost capital flowThe conversation around financing for technology firms should not be limited to equity alone; the integration of diverse bond products is vital for fostering a robust funding environment.

Investment banking and institutional capacities also warrant elevationHistorically, a significant setback for Alibaba in 2013 was the rigidity of Hong Kong's listing rulesHence, reforming such systemic barriers is essentialThe experiences of companies that see their stocks underperform post-listing can shake investor confidence and deter further participation in the marketThus, creating a culture of robust valuation assessments by investment entities, especially regarding unique enterprises requiring tailor-made approaches, could fortify market integrity.

Focus should also be channeled towards cultivating long-term, patient capitalThis includes favorable fiscal policies directed at venture capital alongside legal structures that enhance the investment climateBy designing a regulatory framework that considers extended investment horizons and supports diverse exit mechanisms, we can entice more resources into sectors poised for transformative growthMoreover, the introduction of a more nuanced regulatory environment for various private equity and venture capital funds can stimulate broader participation.

Moreover, enhancing the market’s regulatory framework is imperativeA stronger foundation of market stability is achievable through fostering high-quality listings and a balanced financial structureTherefore, the emphasis must be on rigorous enforcement against pseudo-innovations and fraud that undermine market integrityA disciplined approach to dividend practices and share buybacks should be enforced to ensure quality firms provide reasonable returns to investors.

During recent forums, industrial leaders notably recognized the rapid revival of economic activity in provinces like Jilin

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements